4th Infantry Division 
Military Review proudly presents exclusive articles highlighting the 4th Infantry Division.
Maj. Gen. David S. Doyle, U.S. Army
Col. Charles M. Knoll, U.S. Army
Col. Daniel R. Leard, U.S. Army
The 4th Infantry Division (Ivy) commander details the objectives for its “Ivy Mass” biennial joint multidomain fire support coordination exercise in a broader discussion of why commanders of corps, divisions, and brigades should more aggressively pursue future concepts related to moving beyond Field Manual 3-0, Operations, in the practical application of measures to achieve multidomain effects.
Article published on: 05 February 2025
Col. Daniel R. Leard, U.S. Army
Maj. Erik M. Ortiz, U.S. Army
Maj. James Gonzalez, U.S. Army
Operational planning teams are a staple of military staff work, and implementing persistent operational planning teams presents a promising approach to optimizing staff organization for long-term continuous operations.
Article published on: 11 December 2024
Sgt. 1st Class Christian R. Ramsey, U.S. Army
Explore how the 4th Infantry Division redefined intelligence targeting in large-scale combat operations (LSCO) with innovative methods like strike cells and intelligence reach operations. Learn how diversifying intelligence sources and enhancing training addressed critical gaps, improved targeting, and fostered a more lethal and adaptive force.
Article published on: 06 November 2024
Maj. Frank Czerniakowski, U.S. Army
Maj. Zachary Jones, U.S. Army
Maj. Daniel Martinez, U.S. Army
Maj. Lam Nguyen, U.S. Army
Achieving “decision dominance” on the battlefield during multidomain operations requires all echelons to integrate within the dataspace so that we may “know ourselves, our adversaries, and the operational environment with greater clarity and precision to produce decision advantages.”
Article published on: 10 October 2024
Col. Anthony Keller, U.S. Army
Lt. Col. Jonathan Bate, U.S. Army
Capt. Brendon Wamsley, U.S. Army
Data analytics can generate powerful insights that resonate across an organization, but the U.S. Army has not kept pace with advances in data analytics, despite the vast amount of data it collects daily.
Article published on: 25 November 2024
February 2025 Online Exclusive Articles
1st Lt. Alexander Mosher, U.S. Army
U.S. special operations forces face a shortfall in Chinese language speakers. This need can be addressed through enhanced ROTC language programs and recruitment efforts targeting those with Chinese fluency.
Article published on: 12 February 2025
Maj. Tashina Miller, PhD, U.S. Army
Maj. Julie Skiles, U.S. Army
The Army must shift its mindset to win the war related to mental health readiness.
Article published on: 10 February 2025
Maj. Gen. David S. Doyle, U.S. Army
Col. Charles M. Knoll, U.S. Army
Col. Daniel R. Leard, U.S. Army
The 4th Infantry Division (Ivy) commander details the objectives for its “Ivy Mass” biennial joint multidomain fire support coordination exercise in a broader discussion of why commanders of Corps, divisions, and brigades should more aggressively pursue future concepts related to moving beyond Field Manual 3-0, Operations in the practical application of measures to achieve multidomain effects.
Article published on: 05 February 2025
Col. Jason H. Rosenstrauch, U.S. Army
Maj. Daniel R. DeNeve, U.S. Army
Maj. Henry G. Harpen, U.S. Army
Maj. Kevin J. Quigley, U.S. Army
By building its organization around the efficient use of data, 3rd Infantry Division reduced staff burden in collecting data, empowering leaders to make faster, better-informed decisions with improved prognostic capability.
Article published on: 04 February 2025
January 2025 Online Exclusive Articles
Lt. Gen. Milford “Beags” Beagle Jr., U.S. Army
Lt. Gen. Joseph B. Berger III, U.S. Army
Lt. Col. Jack D. Einhorn, U.S. Army
Considering the scale, scope, and violence of large-scale combat operations, the rules of engagement will need to be permissive to effectively execute mission command with the appropriate level of control, and commanders must have a personal understanding of the law of armed conflict and ensure the same for their subordinates.
Article published on: 17 January 2025
Col. Andrew Morgado, U.S. Army
Bob O’Brien
Army leaders undergo a rigorous, comprehensive selection process for battalion and brigade command during the Army’s Command Assessment Program.
Article published on: 15 January 2025
Michael J. McNerney
Brig. Gen. Matthew Isler, U.S. Air Force, Retired
Policymakers and warfighters must understand how civilian harm mitigation and response (CHMR) improves strategic outcomes and operational effectiveness, and that CHMR plays a key role in helping the United States align its military actions with its values.
Article published on: 08 January 2025
Gen. Gary M. Brito, U.S. Army
The large amounts of data on the battlefield must be managed, filtered, and understood to be useful. The rapid rate of technological expansion and the explosion of digital systems providing us data underscores the need for data-literate soldiers.
Article published on: 07 January 2025