Publishing Disclaimer: In all of its publications and products, NCO Journal presents professional information. However, the views expressed therein are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Army University, the Department of the US Army, or any other agency of the US Government.

Discipline Saves More Lives Than Marksmanship

By Command Sgt. Maj. James L. Light

1st Armored Division

January 5, 2025

Download the PDF

This image show a line of nine Soldiers in fatigues walking in single file down a rocky path.

Introduction

CONTACT FRONT! 50 METERS!

As hot steel flew in all directions, elements of 2nd Platoon, Bravo Troop, 1st Squadron, 32nd Cavalry Regiment, determined they made chance contact with a Taliban force of equal size. It was the winter of 2010 in Eastern Afghanistan’s Kunar River valley, a highly kinetic, or active, area at the time.

And the Taliban had the high ground.

The patrol leader was a young cavalry scout staff sergeant. He rapidly assessed the situation as his squad gained fire superiority and gave the only order he could: “Break contact!”

The squad leader and two team leaders did exactly as they were trained and executed a “to standard” break contact battle drill and safely returned to Combat Outpost Pirtle-King. As soon as they returned, the squad members realized they had a problem.

The courageous staff sergeant reported immediately to the first sergeant at the troop command post — me. He simply said, “First sergeant, we have an issue.”

“Were there casualties?” I asked.

“No.”

He then explained he lost his map while maneuvering his squad. As he delivered the news, I noticed his left cargo pocket wasn’t secured. Pointing to the pocket, I asked if that’s where he’d carried the map.

“Yes.”

He had made a grave error and failed to do a simple task ingrained since basic combat training: Keep pockets secured at all times. It was a lapse in individual discipline.

Discipline should be assessed at the individual, team, and organizational level. As individuals, we must hold ourselves accountable to our values, creeds, and ethos. We must build self-policing, cohesive teams that accept nothing less than the standard in every endeavor.

Organizations must understand commanders’ guidance, training priorities, and their role in accomplishing the Army’s mission through a disciplined approach. It’s the sum of these three that helps determine our personal success in the Army, of our teams in training, and of our formations in battle.

Discipline is an essential element of a leader’s character and the cornerstone of the Army profession. It’s so essential that it’s referenced 44 times in FM 6-22: Developing Leaders. Paragraph 1-21 describes the role and responsibility of the NCO corps in establishing and maintaining discipline:

“1-21. NCOs are responsible for setting and maintaining high-quality standards and discipline while conducting daily missions making decisions based on disciplined initiative derived from commanders’ intent. NCOs serve as standard-bearers and role models vital to training, educating, and developing subordinates. Through training, coaching, mentoring, counseling, and informal interaction, NCOs guide Soldier development every day and play a role in developing junior officers. NCOs advise officers at all levels and are an important source of knowledge, experience, and discipline for all enlisted matters.” (Department of the Army [DA], 2022)

NCOs train, teach, and mentor all Soldiers in every formation. Therefore, their example is paramount. Discipline as a character attribute is described in paragraph 4-21:

“4-21. Discipline is a mindset for a unit or an organization to practice sustained, systematic actions to reach and promote a capability to perform its military function. Often this involves attending to organization and administration details, which are less urgent than an organization’s key tasks, but necessary for efficiency and long-term effectiveness. Making the right choices involves discipline. Discipline is a reinforcing function to character. Self-discipline is everyone’s responsibility, while leaders also are responsible for unit discipline. Development relies on self-discipline to put others’ needs ahead of personal comfort and desires. The attribute discipline has a single component: Control personal behavior.” (DA, 2022)

You can assess discipline by using table 4-11 (DA, 2022): Control personal behavior. Using this manual can help us improve ourselves, the team, and our organization.

The Individual

Self-discipline is each Soldier’s ability to hold themselves accountable to basic standards. Every standard in the Army profession has a purpose that improves lethality and survivability.

NCOs must ensure they understand and communicate that purpose during training and garrison activity to build good habits they will use during wartime. Each Soldier must also adhere to the elements of Army character to build trust between team members and guarantee ethical conduct in battle.

Table-4-11

Discipline is more easily maintained when purpose is effectively communicated, creating shared understanding and promoting ownership at the individual level.

Soldiers need to know why they do what they do every day. For example, barracks, uniform, and equipment inspections teach them how to live clean, look professional, and account for their equipment (which drives down needless damage or loss of personnel, supply, and equipment).

Physical training is conducted to ensure they’re ready, physically and mentally, to accomplish wartime tasks. When you’re crawling into a trench with the enemy, that’s the wrong time to wish you’d spent more time in the gym!

Maintenance is done regularly to keep equipment ready to fight when called upon. Remember, we will fight with what’s in our motor pool! Once Soldiers know why, it becomes easier to foster commitment, and committed Soldiers will want to do what’s right and put forth maximum effort (even when leaders are not there to supervise).

For commitment to be long lived, Soldiers must
be grounded in all character attributes. Train character as often as possible to help them develop
the personal and professional strengths that enable their long-term success.

This image show a group of three Soldiers in fatigues crouched on a mountain path with guns drawn.

The Army must be their chief influencer. The stronger their character attributes, the more likely they continue to make the right decisions — decisions that look like personal accountability … which means discipline.

Soldiers look to sergeants to show them the way, so sergeants must maintain and display self-discipline in all they do. The example they set as NCOs through their appearance and how they carry themselves is how others most readily learn what right looks like. Someone is always looking. The more stripes and rockers you have, the more they look — and the greater the impact of your presence.

Living the NCO creed, as best as they can, is how NCOs ensure they set the best example possible. It’s something they must become, not just something they recite. Through years of repetition and reflection, it must be the lens through which they view all things … including themselves.

NCOs must put in the daily work to grow closer to the profession and hold peers accountable to the same standards. Character drift is real, and staying grounded in the requirements of service to the formation is paramount.

It’s never about the name tag. You must be committed to what’s on the left side of your chest, not the right (U.S. Army, not your last name). Your personal example will be what your team emulates, good or bad.

The Team

Back to the story, the squad’s action that night was exceptional. Although there was a problem to solve, the team’s actions were not reflective of the leader’s lack of discipline. Their stealthy movement allowed them to surprise the enemy rather than walk into an ambush.

Their textbook execution of the react to contact battle drill allowed them to quickly gain fire superiority and generate options. Great communication and fire distribution allowed them to break contact and withdraw without casualties. It was the discipline in training, execution of battle drills, and trust in one another that won the day.

Team cohesion is protected first and foremost by the team members themselves. What every team leader should work to build is an environment where everyone is invested in the success of the individuals around them and the team as a whole.

Peer leadership and peer accountability will close gaps exposed by team members’ waning discipline and assist those struggling to achieve a standard. Individuals don’t win championships in team sports, and the same holds true for war.

The leader’s actions shape the team daily, regardless of rank and echelon. Consistent attitude and effort shape those of your subordinates. Good standard operating procedures (SOPs) and consistent standards enforcement create clear expectations and ease friction when integrating new team members. Predictability day to day reduces stress on formations and improves trust, performance, and morale.

Finally, leaders should ensure the team’s culture is in line with the larger team of teams. Misaligned subcultures can quickly take shape and be destructive to the Soldiers within and the greater mission. Be proud of your team, your patch, and the Army!

The crucible of combat can be destructive to cohesion built during training. Veterans of the last war will speak of complacency regularly occurring during transition periods or prolonged risk exposure. Over time and with continued exposure, discipline erodes if not minded daily. The standards and habits built in garrison matter most in this case.

I’ve seen more Soldiers killed or wounded in battle and training from failing to enforce or follow a standard than from enemy fire. It’s been proven time and again that the enemy is not better than us … it’s the erosion of discipline that creates opportunities for our enemies to succeed. We can overcome this effect through consistent focus on our routine business.

Never feel sorry for yourself and remember what you’re training for. The secured cargo pocket matters on month nine just like it did on day one.

This images shows a group of Soldiers, from behind, walking on a dirt path.

The Organization

We both knew the lost map was sensitive. It had critical graphics and target reference points for the entire valley. If the enemy found it, we’d all be in danger. I had no choice but to order the squad back up the mountain to recover it.

“Go get it,” I told them.

We both knew the risks associated with the decision, but as a troop, we execute without question. The squad went back out and recovered the map without incident and, no doubt, saved lives by doing so.

I’ve heard countless leaders describe disciplined organizations as those that do routine things routinely. I don’t know who first said this, but it’s true and worth further discussion to understand what that means in practice.

It starts with shaping your formation’s environment to enable its success. You do this by communicating expectations and priorities and then aligning organizational resources and activities with those expectations and priorities. These are key to building trust with Soldiers and creating predictability in the lives of those you lead.

Effective training management systems that produce accurate and detailed company training schedules are the best example of how we synchronize resources and provide predictability for Soldiers. Details and accuracy help the NCO corps implement the eight-step training model for upcoming training and schedule routine business around that training.

Routine training meetings are the company-level leader’s tool to synchronize resources and hold platoons accountable for getting routine things done right. These training schedules become the most important factor in creating a predictable environment, unlocking the power of the NCO corps, and enabling organizational discipline.

All larger organization leaders are responsible for ensuring readiness guidance is communicated, planned, and resourced to create good company-level training.

Simultaneously, battalion and brigade command teams and staff should guard jealously against distractions that interfere with priorities. Companies should prioritize achieving the standard while training and maintaining, and they should exercise discipline to avoid sacrificing that standard for time.

This image shows a Soldier in fatigues on the ground behind a gun on a stand. Another Soldier stands, bending over him pointing forward.

We must all remain focused on mastering the fundamentals and resist any additional tasks that disrupt our disciplined approach to warfighting readiness. Every hour of training and every minute of every meeting should drive the organization toward that end.

A disciplined unit will not accept anything less than every Soldier meeting the standard during training and will continue to train until it is met. Good units will not prioritize completing tasks over quality repetitions.

Disciplined units will minimize unofficial means of communication that disrupt training schedules and will fight for predictability. NCOs, particularly command sergeants major, first sergeants, and platoon sergeants, guard the standard and protect the environment they strive to create.

Conclusion

Discipline should be assessed in the individual, team, and organization. As individuals, we must hold ourselves accountable to our values, creeds, and ethos. We must build self-policing, cohesive teams that accept nothing less than the standard in every endeavor.

Organizations must understand commanders’ guidance, training priorities, and their role in accomplishing the Army’s mission through a disciplined approach. It is the sum of these three that helps determine personal success in the Army, of teams in training, and of formations in battle.

NCOs are not just encouraged or asked to set a good example, uphold the standard, and maintain discipline. They are responsible for it! It’s stated time and again in training and leadership doctrine, the NCO Guide, and Army Command Policy. It’s what Soldiers deserve, what officers expect, and what the profession demands.

Together, we must shape the environment in our formations, regardless of size, to execute all tasks to a high standard — the standard required to win the first battle of the next war.

The B Troop squad survived that encounter with a superior force without casualties because they were trained to a high standard, trusted one another, and were disciplined in executing their individual and collective tasks — not because they were great marksmen (which they were).

They were successful because they understood the map’s importance to the greater mission and to every Soldier’s life on that outpost and in that valley. Subsequently, we had the organizational discipline to recover it.

To this day, you won’t find me with a pocket flap, strap, or zipper unsecured. If you do, I have a division coin with your name on it! Trust also that I will check you, and if you come up short, I’ll share this story with you again while you push!


References

Department of the Army. (2022). FM 6-22: Developing Leaders. https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN43044-FM_6-22-002-WEB-5.pdf

 

Command Sgt. Maj. James L. Light is command sergeant major of 1st Armored Division and Fort Bliss, Texas. He enlisted in the Army in 1996, and attended One Station Unit Training at Fort Knox, Kentucky. He has held a variety of leadership positions, from tank gunner, battalion master gunner, brigade equal opportunity advisor, and senior military science instructor, to brigade command sergeant major. More recently, he served as the command sergeant major for 1st Squadron, 7th Cavalry; 1st Armored Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division; 3rd Security Force Assistance Brigade; and the U.S. Army Combat Readiness Center. Light holds an associate degree in applied technologies from Central Texas College.

Back to Top